基于层次分析法的反无人集群电子战系统作战试验环境构设评估方法

杜鹏飞, 廖学军, 尹依伊, 吴俊儒

装备环境工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (10) : 149-156.

PDF(1082 KB)
PDF(1082 KB)
装备环境工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (10) : 149-156. DOI: 10.7643/ issn.1672-9242.2025.10.018
环境试验与观测

基于层次分析法的反无人集群电子战系统作战试验环境构设评估方法

  • 杜鹏飞1, 2, 廖学军1, *, 尹依伊3, 吴俊儒1
作者信息 +

Construction and Evaluation Methods of Operational Test Environment for Anti Unmanned Cluster Electronic Warfare System

  • DU Pengfei1, 2, LIAO Xuejun1, *, YIN Yiyi3, WU Junru1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 针对环境构设效果难以量化评价、指标体系不清晰等问题,研究一种基于层次分析法的反无人集群电子战系统作战试验环境构设评估方法。方法 根据反无人集群电子战系统的特征及环境构设需求,开展指标体系划分,以逼真度、性价比及多用途性作为准则层,并基于环境构设要素实现基准层的细化,建立3层9类27项的反无人集群电子战系统环境构评估指标体系。基于层次分析法构建综合评价模型,并提出基于模糊综合评价法的反无人集群系统环境构设量化评价方法。结果 以某试验为例开展了应用验证,证明了指标体系的合理性及评价方法的有效性。结论 本文所提评估方法为反无人集群电子战系统环境构设的量化分析提供了清晰的框架基础与技术支持,确保了评价过程的系统性与科学性。

Abstract

The work aims to propose an evaluation method of operational test environment construction of anti-unmanned cluster electronic warfare systems based on an analytic hierarchy process to deal with the problem that the effect of environment construction is difficult to quantify and the index system is not clear. According to the characteristics of the anti-unmanned cluster electronic exhibition system and the requirements of environmental construction, the index system was divided. The fidelity, cost performance and multi-purpose were taken as the criterion layer, and the base layer was refined based on the environmental construction elements. A three-layer, nine-category and 27-item environmental construction evaluation index system of the anti-unmanned cluster electronic warfare system was established. Based on the analytic hierarchy process, a comprehensive evaluation model was constructed, and a quantitative evaluation method for the environmental construction of the anti-unmanned cluster system based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was proposed. Taking a test as an example, the application verification was carried out, which proved the rationality of the index system and the effectiveness of the evaluation method. The evaluation method proposed in this paper provides a clear framework basis and technical support for the quantitative analysis of the environment configuration of the anti-unmanned cluster electronic warfare system, and ensures the systematic and scientific evaluation process.

关键词

反无人集群 / 电子战系统 / 环境构设 / 层次分析 / 模糊综合评价 / 评估指标体系

Key words

anti-unmanned cluster / electronic warfare system / environmental construction / analytic hierarchy process / fuzzy comprehensive evaluation / evaluation index system

引用本文

导出引用
杜鹏飞, 廖学军, 尹依伊, 吴俊儒. 基于层次分析法的反无人集群电子战系统作战试验环境构设评估方法[J]. 装备环境工程. 2025, 22(10): 149-156 https://doi.org/10.7643/ issn.1672-9242.2025.10.018
DU Pengfei, LIAO Xuejun, YIN Yiyi, WU Junru. Construction and Evaluation Methods of Operational Test Environment for Anti Unmanned Cluster Electronic Warfare System[J]. Equipment Environmental Engineering. 2025, 22(10): 149-156 https://doi.org/10.7643/ issn.1672-9242.2025.10.018
中图分类号: E91   

参考文献

[1] 赵超, 周伦, 龙照飞, 等. 靶场训练环境构设效果评估方法研究[J]. 装备环境工程, 2024, 21(4): 148-155.
ZHAO C, ZHOU L, LONG Z F, et al.Method to Evaluate the Effect of Environment Construction for Training in Range[J]. Equipment Environmental Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 148-155.
[2] 戎华, 邵晓方. 基于逼真度的战场电磁环境构设效果评估方法[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2014, 28(3): 35-38.
RONG H, SHAO X F.Evaluation Method of Battlefield Electromagnetic Environment Construction Effect Based on Fidelity[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2014, 28(3): 35-38.
[3] 范宝亮. 基于Vague集相似度的海战场复杂电磁环境构设逼真度评估[J]. 电子制作, 2018, 26(18): 11-12.
FAN B L.Fidelity Evaluation of Complex Electromagnetic Environment Construction in Sea Battlefield Based on Vague Set Similarity[J]. Practical Electronics, 2018, 26(18): 11-12.
[4] 赵顺恺, 李修和, 沈阳, 等. 基于Vague集相似度的战场电磁环境构设逼真度评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2015, 40(12): 106-110.
ZHAO S K, LI X H, SHEN Y, et al.Vague Set Similarity Theory-Based Method for Evaluating Battlefield Electromagnetic Environment Construction Fidelity[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2015, 40(12): 106-110.
[5] 梁桃红, 刘正锋, 栾伟, 等. 训练电磁环境构设的威胁度评估[J]. 数字技术与应用, 2018, 36(8): 226-228.
LIANG T H, LIU Z F, LUAN W, et al.The Threat Degree Assessment of Training Electromagnetic Environment Construction[J]. Digital Technology & Application, 2018, 36(8): 226-228.
[6] 陈馨, 杨东升, 孟冲, 等. 一种基于层次分析法的复杂电磁环境相似度评估方法[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2024, 19(2): 127-137.
CHEN X, YANG D S, MENG C, et al.A Similarity Evaluation Method for Complex Electromagnetic Environment Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Journal of China Academy of Electronics and Information Technology, 2024, 19(2): 127-137.
[7] 攸立准. 电磁环境构设逼真度评估方法研究[J]. 无线电通信技术, 2016, 42(2): 84-87.
YOU L Z.Research on Fidelity Evaluation of Electromagnetic Environment Construction[J]. Radio Communications Technology, 2016, 42(2): 84-87.
[8] 彭进先, 高澜, 桑苗苗, 等. 基于战场电磁效应目标的复杂电磁环境构设研究[J]. 雷达与对抗, 2024, 44(2): 1-6.
PENG J X, GAO L, SANG M M, et al.Research on Complex Electromagnetic Environment Construction Based on Battlefield Electromagnetic Effect Targets[J]. Radar & ECM, 2024, 44(2): 1-6.
[9] 段继琨, 韩鹏. 基于相似理论的复杂电磁环境逼真度评估研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2020, 40(5): 184-188.
DUAN J K, HAN P.Research on the Evaluation of Complex Electromagnetic Environment Fidelity Based on Similitude Theory[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2020, 40(5): 184-188.
[10] YUAN Y T, SONG J, LIU M, et al.Construction and Application of Marine Ecological Restoration Project Effect Assessment System Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Water, 2025, 17(9): 1334.
[11] SAFRIZAL, HASANUDDIN, RUSDI M, et al.Assesment of Land Characteristics for Pacthouli Plantations Based on Climate Criteria: A Combination of Spatial Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2025, 1477(1): 012003.
[12] 满家兴. 基于层次分析法的部队内部控制评价研究——以武警A总队基层单位为例[D]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2019.
MAN J X.Research on Evaluation of Internal Control of Armed Forces Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process— Taking the Grass-Roots Units of Armed Police A Corps as an Example[D]. Chengdu: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 2019.
[13] VAZ L A V, ALMEIDA FILGUEIRA H J, ROSENDO E E Q, et al. A Novel Integration of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Logic to Evaluate Drought Vulnerability in a Semiarid Region[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2025, 99: 102221.
[14] 田苗苗, 彭进先, 周伦, 等. 基于模糊综合评价法的雷达对抗装备能力评估研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2025, 53(3): 182-190.
TIAN M M, PENG J X, ZHOU L, et al.Research on the Capability Evaluation of Radar Countermeasure Equipment Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Model[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2025, 53(3): 182-190.
[15] 马文璇, 曹雪飞. 面向应急警用装备保障效能的多级模糊综合评价研究[J]. 警察技术, 2023(3): 56-63.
MA W X, CAO X F.Research on Multi-Level Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Emergency Police Equipment Guaranteed Effectiveness[J]. Police Technology, 2023(3): 56-63.
[16] YAN X T, GONG J, HE J, et al.Integrated Data Mining and TOPSIS Entropy Weight Method to Evaluate Logistics Supply and Demand Efficiency of a 3PL Company[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 2020(1): 7057143.
[17] YADOLLAHI E, HANG TUAH BAHARUDIN B T, BINTI ABDUL AZIZ N. Evaluation of Different Factors in Implementation of JIT Production System by Applying Simulation and Entropy Weighting Method[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 472/473/474/475: 446-450.
[18] 燕吉, 杨同柱. 基于熵权法的陆军装备维修器材配送路径优化[J]. 军事交通学院学报, 2020(12): 58-62.
YAN J, YANG T Z.Distribution Path Optimization of Army Equipment Maintenance Materials Based on Entropy Weight Method[J]. Journal of Military Transportation University, 2020(12): 58-62.
[19] ZHAO J T, TANG Q F, XU X, et al.ERP Implement Performance Evaluation of Power Supply Company Based on Gray Triangle Whiten Function[J]. Systems Engineering Procedia, 2012, 5: 340-348.
[20] 黄金鑫, 党耀国, 叶璟, 等. 基于区间灰数的中心点白化权函数灰色评价模型——以南京A疗养院满意度评价为例[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2024, 54(7): 15-27.
HUANG J X, DANG Y G, YE J, et al.Gray Evaluation Model of Centroid Whitening Weight Function Based on Interval Gray Numbers: An Example of Satisfaction Evaluation of Nanjing a Sanatorium[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2024, 54(7): 15-27.
[21] CHANG Y, YUAN C H, OUYANG H M.Research on Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Contract Energy Management Based on Grey Whitening Weight Function[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 242: 022004.
[22] 马丽丽, 王芳, 李梨榕. 基于AHP-BP人工神经网络的型号装备可靠性设计质量评价方法研究[J]. 电子质量, 2018(6): 19-22.
MA L L, WANG F, LI L R.The Research of Model Equipment Reliability Design Quality Evaluation Method Based on AHP-BP Artificial Neural Network[J]. Electronics Quality, 2018(6): 19-22.
[23] 李华楠, 郝威, 张世伟. 基于BP神经网络的通信训练考核评估方法[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2015, 35(6): 80-82.
LI H N, HAO W, ZHANG S W.Communication Training Examining and Evaluating Method Based on BP Neural Network[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2015, 35(6): 80-82.
[24] HAO J S, HUANG Q Z, LI S D. Based on the BP Neural Network of Logistics Equipment Support Capability Evaluation[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 546/547: 1090-1094.
[25] HU D L, YU J R.Evaluation of Resource-Capabilities of Original Equipment Manufacturers Upgrading Based on BP Neural Network[J]. NeuroQuantology, 2018, 16(6): 546-553.

PDF(1082 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/